Evan Bynoe vs Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Upon examining the second serve performance over the past six months, Bynoe appears slightly more proficient, with a win rate of 44.97% on their second serve points, compared to Schulenburg's 40.91%. This particular statistic is closely linked to match prediction accuracy, hinting at potential outcomes.

In terms of return games, Schulenburg has the advantage in recent form, winning 45.28% of points on their opponent's second serve, whereas Bynoe lags slightly behind at 43.8%. However, when it comes to first serve returns, Bynoe takes precedence, having won 34.73% of points in contrast to Schulenburg's 30.65%. These statistics have a high correlation with determining the favored player in head-to-head matchups.

Under pressure, both players have shown resilience. Schulenburg saves 58.44% of breakpoints faced, surpassing Bynoe who has saved 54.68%. These figures are particularly insightful for in-game betting predictions, reflecting the players' ability to handle critical moments.

Reviewing performance over the past year, Bynoe has achieved a match win rate of 54.9% (W/L 28/23). Schulenburg, however, has a slightly superior win percentage of 59.26% (W/L 16/11), providing a broader perspective on head-to-head predictions.

When it comes to surface preferences, Bynoe excels on clay with a 61% win rate (W/L 31/20) but struggles on indoor hard courts, with a 43% win rate (W/L 9/12). Conversely, Schulenburg's best performances occur on hard courts, winning 69% (W/L 11/5), while indoor hard courts remain his weakest surface, with a 45% win rate (W/L 5/6).

Analyzing recent tournament levels, both players have participated primarily in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K. Bynoe won 54.9% of their matches in such events, whereas Schulenburg outperformed with a 64% win rate. This level of play provides context when comparing players' stats and predicting the favorite.

Bynoe's opponents have had an average rank of 216.71 over the past 12 months, indicating a tougher competitive field compared to Schulenburg's opponents, whose average rank stood at 256.44. Additionally, Bynoe has a higher success rate in deciding sets, winning 42% compared to Schulenburg's 33%, an important factor for live predictions and betting if the match extends to a deciding set.

Finally, in recent form, Bynoe has slightly outperformed Schulenburg in break point conversion, managing to convert 36.9% of opportunities compared to Schulenburg's 34.69%. This capability is significant for live betting, as it provides insights into each player's proficiency in breaking service games.

Based on these statistics, Bynoe appears to have a slightly better chance of emerging victorious in the upcoming match, with strengths in second serve performance, first serve returns, and a higher success rate in deciding sets. However, Schulenburg's ability to save break points and superior performance in return games presents a formidable challenge.